Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of Endemiology ; (12): 835-837, 2020.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-866214

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the clinical significance of six serological methods for diagnosis of brucellosis.Methods:Totally 160 cases of brucellosis patients were selected as the case group and 235 cases of health medical examiners were selected as the control group from January to June 2018 in Heilongjiang Agricultural Reclamation Bureau General Hospital. Six methods were used for detection of brucellosis, including Rose Bengal plate agglutination test (RBPT), fluorescence polarization assay (FPA), indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (iELISA), cysteine agglutination test, standard tube agglutination test (SAT), and anti-globulin test (Coomb's). The consistency of the 4 preliminary screening methods (RBPT vs FPA, iELISA, cysteine agglutination test), and 2 diagnosis methods (SAT vs Coomb's) was compared, and the sensitivity, specificity, rates of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis were analyzed. Results:In the preliminary screening methods, the consistency of RBPT with FPA and iELISA was relatively consistent (Kappa = 0.872, 0.784), and the consistency with cysteine agglutination test was generally consistent (Kappa = 0.543). In the diagnosis methods, the consistency between SAT and Coomb's was relatively consistent (Kappa = 0.861). The sensitivity of FPA, iELISA, cysteine agglutination test and Coomb's was 91.03%, 75.00%, 56.41% and 80.14%, respectively. The specificity was 95.81%, 100.00%, 98.74% and 100.00%, respectively. The rates of missed diagnosis were 8.97%, 25.00%, 43.59% and 19.86%, respectively. The rates of misdiagnosis were 4.19%, 0, 1.26%, and 0, respectively.Conclusions:FPA and iELISA have high sensitivity and specificity, and are suitable for clinical promotion. The combined detection of multiple serological methods will reduce the probability of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis of brucellosis, thereby improving the diagnostic level of brucellosis.

2.
Chinese Journal of Endemiology ; (12): 459-461, 2015.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-471070

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the diagnostic value of fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) for human brucellosis.Methods From April 2013 to August 2014,240 positive sera of brucella patients were collected as case group and 287 normal sera as control group in Heilongjiang Agricultural Reclamation Bureau General Hospital.Four milliliters of venous blood were withdrawn for separation of serum.Fluorescence polarization assay was used and the consistency,sensitivity and specificity were compared with those of four classical serological methods,including rose bengal plate agglutination test (RBPT),standard tube agglutination test (SAT),Coomb's test and cysteine test.Results The results of FPA were complied with those of the four conventional serological methods,Kappa ≥ 0.75.The sensitivity of FPA (89.17%) was higher than that of RBPT (87.08%),SAT (85.00%),Coomb's (74.17%) and cysteine test (75.83%).The specificity of FPA (94.08%) was higher than that of RBPT (89.90%) and Coomb's (81.53%),but lower than that of SAT (98.95%) and cysteine test (99.30%).Conclusion FPA can be used as a laboratory diagnostic method for human brucellosis,which is worthy to be widely used.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL